A coder's home for Marc "Foddex" Oude Kotte, who used to be located in Enschede, The Netherlands, but now in Stockholm, Sweden!
foddex.net

PHP Lesson 3: File locking in PHP without flock(), but with NFS support!

File locks without flock() (but with NFS support)



I wanted to discuss a file lock class I've developed based on experience with that subject the last few years. I've found it to be particularly useful, especially because it works without flock(), and on NFS shared network drives. It does not use flock(), since that's not (very well) supported on NFS filesystems, even though it's sometimes claimed otherwise. It is not very portable outside the Unix/Linux environment, however.

The pro's:
- lean and mean
- works on local hard-drives and network drives
- no flock()
- decent NFS support
- can be used across multiple (PHP) processes and even multiple servers, as long as they share the path where the lock files are written

The con's:
- limited Windows support (PHP.net says: now available on Windows platforms (Vista, Server 2008 or greater).)
- only useable when the same code is used all application that should acknowledge the lock, i.e. not useable for locking against other application (e.g. system tools)


Inner workings



My file lock class uses a name to uniquely reference a lock. So all applications that should acknowledge the lock, should all use the same name. For example, if you have four applications that need to get mutual access to some resource named "directory", all applications should use this file lock class and specify "directory" as the name for the lock. That way they all work against the same lock file on the filesystem.

It is not required that the applications live inside the same process, or even the same PC. As long as they use the same code, and have access to the same file lock on a (shared) filesystem, it works. This is very convenient when you have to obtain access to a resource that might be in use over multiple servers.

The way the file lock class works is quite simple. There is a fixed path where lock files are stored. The name of the lock is used to determine the filename on the filesystem. So e.g. if the lock path is "/tmp/", and the lock is named "directory", the lock file will be "/tmp/directory.lock". Then, when you try to lock the lock, the implementation writes a unique temporary file in the lock path, and tries to hardlink it on filesystem level to the the actual lock filename. This might require some more detail:

When locking lock "directory", the following filename is generated, where PIDOFPROCESS is replaced with the current PID of the process, and RANDOMNUMBER is the result of a call to mt_rand():
/tmp/directory.lock.pid.PIDOFPROCESS.mtrand.RANDOMNUMBER

Then, this file is hardlinked to the actual lock file, so when it succeeds, you have two files referencing the same inode on disk:
/tmp/directory.lock.pid.PIDOFPROCESS.mtrand.RANDOMNUMBER
/tmp/directory.lock

Then, regardless of the success of the link() call, the unique file is removed, which in filesystem terms means the referencecount to the inode is lowered: the actual file is not deleted, since /tmp/directory.lock still references it!

When the link() call succeeded, we obtained the lock. When it failed, the file already existed, meaning some other process got the lock, and a failure to lock is reported.

The trick in the entire setup is the fact that link() is guaranteed to be "thread safe" on local filesystems, but also on NFS systems! It's a guaranteed atomic operation. Simply creating the original file may seem like a simpler solution, but it will fail not work, since (weirdly enough) creating a file is NOT an atomic operation!

One note: ofcourse "/tmp/" is only useful when all processes that require locking functionality live on the same PC. When you need a shared NFS directory as a lockpath, don't forget to update the lockpath in the code! (As detailed below.)

The interface



define( 'LOCKFILE_SUCCESS', 1 ); // success result: the lock was obtained! define( 'LOCKFILE_ERROR_ALREADY_LOCKED', -1 ); // error result: lock was already locked, try again later define( 'LOCKFILE_ERROR_FAIL_TO_OBTAIN_LOCK', -2 ); // error result: oops, lock wasn't locked, but failed to write lockfile! class Filelock { public static $lockpath = '/tmp/'; private $name; private $filename; private $i_locked = false; public function __construct( $name ); public function is_locked(); // always instantly returns with either TRUE or FALSE to indicate if SOMEONE (not us per se!) has the lock public function try_lock(); // attempts to lock, returns instantly when already locked returning FALSE, or returns instantly when locked, returning TRUE public function lock(); // will wait inifitely to obtain a lock public function unlock( $force=false ); // when called without arguments, unlocks ONLY if this object also obtained the lock... when true is passed as first parameter, ALWAYS forcibly unlocks! private function bake_data(); // private function }


To use this lock file class, simply create an instance of the Filelock class with the name of the lock (as explained earlier) :

$lock = new Filelock( "myfirstlock" ); if ($lock->is_locked()) die( "Process locked!" ); if ($lock->try_lock()) die( "First time lock call succeeded, we have exclusive access!" ); $lock->lock(); // will wait infinitely to obtain the lock ... do work, not being disturbed by anyone ... $lock->unlock(); // release!


To change the lockpath, simply set the static variable once:

Filelock::$lockpath = '/var/lib/locks';


The implementation



Copy/paste from below, or download here.

define( 'LOCKFILE_SUCCESS', 1 ); define( 'LOCKFILE_ERROR_ALREADY_LOCKED', -1 ); define( 'LOCKFILE_ERROR_FAIL_TO_OBTAIN_LOCK', -2 ); class Filelock { public static $lockpath = '/tmp/'; private $name; private $filename; private $i_locked = false; public function __construct( $name ) { $this->name = $name; $this->filename = Filelock::$lockpath . preg_replace( '/\W/', '_', $name ) . '.lock'; } public function is_locked() { return file_exists( $this->filename ); } public function try_lock() { if ($this->is_locked()) return LOCKFILE_ERROR_ALREADY_LOCKED; // write tempfile $tempfile = $this->filename . '.pid.' . getmypid() . '.mtrand.' . mt_rand(); if (!@file_put_contents( $tempfile, serialize( $this->bake_data() ) )) return LOCKFILE_ERROR_FAILED_OBTAINING_LOCK; // try to hard link tempfile to lockpath if (!@link( $tempfile, $this->filename )) { @unlink( $tempfile ); return LOCKFILE_ERROR_ALREADY_LOCKED; } // cleanup $this->i_locked = true; @unlink( $tempfile ); return LOCKFILE_SUCCESS; } public function lock() { do { $res = $this->try_lock(); if ($res != LOCKFILE_ERROR_ALREADY_LOCKED) break; usleep( 100000 ); // try again after 0.1 seconds } while (true); return $res; } public function unlock( $force=false ) { if ($force || $this->i_locked) { $this->i_locked = false; @unlink( $this->filename ); } } public function bake_data() { return array( 'mypid' => getmypid(), 'timestamp' => date( 'd-m-Y H:i:s' ), 'name' => $this->name, ); } }



6 comment(s)

Click to write your own comment

On Mon 09-12-2013 13:13 Stefan B. wrote: Great script, thank you! :)

Unfortunately the lock will not be removed if there is an exception in the executed code (at: "do work, not being disturbed by anyone"). So it's locked and never get unlocked?
On Tue 17-12-2013 12:09 foddex wrote: Stefan: that is correct. How to deal with this is very much depending on your application, and how serious such an exception would be.

One solution would be to read the lock data, parse the "mypid" value and see if a process with the given pid still exists. If so, it's probably a "live" lock, if not it's probably a dead lock. Mind the fact that I write "probably", since you can't really be 100% sure. Some other process might have gotten the same pid!

Keeping the filelock, and warning the user about it (output? mail? again, this depends on how you use this) might be another solution. A human can then decide to simply delete the file, or investigate what exactly failed.
On Wed 05-09-2018 17:10 deti wrote: I posted an alternative build on your code at:

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6967553/php-flock-alternative/52190213#52190213

Thanks for preliminary work!!!
On Wed 11-10-2023 20:03 Emily Porteous wrote: It's finally possible to get top quality buyer clicks for just mere pennies!

We have a large network of global traffic in each country and we are looking to distribute that traffic.

Visit us here: awolfservices.com to find out more.
On Thu 01-02-2024 12:58 Julie Shuman wrote: Hi foddex

We are proud to present our new website for all your B2B and B2C data and advertising needs.

https://foddex.marketingfriend.biz

We offer a large range of products and to assist you in getting ahead this new yeah with better advertising and reaching more clients in your specific niche. Our products include all of the following:

We provide a free live search on site so you can see the amount and type of data we provide.
Pre-compiled B2B and B2C data sets with all the necessary fields\columns included to assist you reach your clients.
If we do not currently have the data you are looking for we are also willing to assist with custom data collection.
Mail servers setup for you able to send over a million mails per day or as per your specifications.

“Stopping advertising to save money is like stopping your watch to save time.” Henry Ford.

https://foddex.marketingfriend.biz

Regards,
MarketingFriend.biz
On Fri 01-03-2024 12:47 Mai Rendall wrote: Hi foddex.net,

We visited your website foddex.net and think that we might have the perfect leads for you.

We are a global lead provider covering all industries that include consumer and business data. Feel free to look through our samples on our website https://foddex.leadsfly.biz/foddex.net

If the samples are not to your liking, talk to us live on site and we might be able to provide you with the exact data you need

Please visit us at https://foddex.leadsfly.biz/foddex.net Your Future Favorite leads provider for 2024

Regards,
Mai
Name:
URL: (optional!)
Write your comment:
Answer this question to prove you're human:
What's the last name of the first black American president?